Legal Opinion

Inland Container Corporation v. March

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1975PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

The sole question before the Court for determination is the correctness of a jury award of punitive damages, approved by the trial judge and upheld by the Court of Appeals.

I

Plaintiff-respondent is the owner of a 50 acre tract of unimproved real estate located in Humphreys County. To all intents and purposes, it is surrounded by a 1900 acre tract upon which the Petitioner, Inland Container Corporation, was cutting timber. The smaller tract is virtually inaccessible, except by jeep or similar vehicle; has no internal road; is only partially under fence; and its boundaries…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knoxville Traction Co. v. LaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Stepp v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
  3. Railroad v. RayTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Honaker v. LeonardDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1971
  5. Burson v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. Overstreet v. Shoney's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  5. Clanton v. Cain-Sloan Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API