Inland Container Corporation v. March
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY, Justice.
The sole question before the Court for determination is the correctness of a jury award of punitive damages, approved by the trial judge and upheld by the Court of Appeals.
I
Plaintiff-respondent is the owner of a 50 acre tract of unimproved real estate located in Humphreys County. To all intents and purposes, it is surrounded by a 1900 acre tract upon which the Petitioner, Inland Container Corporation, was cutting timber. The smaller tract is virtually inaccessible, except by jeep or similar vehicle; has no internal road; is only partially under fence; and its boundaries…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Knoxville Traction Co. v. LaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
- Stepp v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
- Railroad v. RayTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- Honaker v. LeonardDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1971
- Burson v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by70 opinions
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Overstreet v. Shoney's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Clanton v. Cain-Sloan Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.