Legal Opinion

United States v. McVicker

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 23, 2013No. Case No. 3:11-cr-00101-SIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge.

Kenneth R. McVicker III (“McVicker” or “Defendant”), a United States citizen, challenges his indictment for producing and transporting child pornography while living abroad. He argues that the statutes for which he has been indicted do not reach conduct that occurs outside the territory of the United States; that venue in the District of Oregon is improper because his conduct was not directed at the district; that his case should be dismissed because the government lacks jurisdiction to prosecute him under the Rule of Specialty; and that…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DeLeonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. United States v. SidorenkoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. State of Washington v. Ricardo Juarez DeleonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. United States v. MonroeDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API