Legal Opinion
Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund v. Terotechnology Corp.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided December 2, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-660-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON BORDEN CHEMICAL’S MOTION TO DISMISS
POLOZOLA, District Judge.
Borden Chemical (“Borden”) employed a contractor, Terotechnology Corporation (“Terotechnology”) to perform work on certain property which was owned by Borden. During this period of time, Terotechnology was obligated under a collective bargaining agreement to make contributions to certain employee pension plans. It is clear that Borden was not a party to this collective bargaining agreement nor was it otherwise obligated to make contributions to the benefit plans. Borden simply owned certain property on which Terotechnology…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund v. Terotechnology Corp., Borden ChemicalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Prestridge v. ShinaultLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989