Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Curtis Investment Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1989No. C7-88-1177PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents State of Minnesota, Curtis Investment Company (CIC), Allright Parking Minnesota, Inc. (APM), Allright Auto Parks, Inc. (AAP), and Leadens Investigation and Security, Inc. (Leadens). It is also a cross-appeal by CIC, APM, and AAP from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing third-party claims against Nu-Way House, Inc. (Nu-Way). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Appellant Garnet Erickson was assaulted and raped at about 5:00 p.m. on December 7, 1983, at the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Cornpropst v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Henley v. Pizitz Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Schmanski v. Church of St. Casimir of WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Erickson v. Curtis Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Adela T. Bailor and Darryl Bailor v. Salvation Army and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  5. Cooper v. Lakewood Engineering & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API