Legal Opinion

Henley v. Pizitz Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 27, 1984No. 83-362PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by plaintiff from a summary judgment for defendant. We affirm.

The basic legal question presented is whether or not a private corporation owes a duty to protect its invitees from a criminal attack.

Plaintiff, Diane Henley, parked her automobile in a parking deck owned and operated by Pizitz Realty Company (Pizitz) as a business enterprise. Upon entering the deck, she was presented with a ticket which recited:

"This Contract Limits Our Liability. Please Read It. This Parking Deck rents space only. No bailment is created; and the Parking Deck is not responsible for loss or damage to car or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Cornpropst v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Vines v. Plantation Motor LodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Lancaster v. MontesiTennessee Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Timberwalk Apartments, Partners, Inc. v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Moye v. A.G. Gaston Motels, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Thetford v. City of ClantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Patrick v. Union State BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Doud v. Las Vegas Hilton Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API