Legal Opinion

Motes v. Putnam County

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 21, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Buford, j.

On appeal we review decree validating refunding bonds to be issued to refund $381,000.00 of bonds alleged to be outstanding of an issue of $500,000.00 of bridge bonds of Putnam County issued July 1, 1924. The original issue of bonds was in the denomination of $1,000.00 each and it is contemplated that the refunding bonds will be in like denominations to be dated December 1, 1939, and maturing as follows:

MaBirity

“Serial ■ Date Amount

Number July I Maturing

1- 19 Inch 1940 $19,000

20- 39 “ • 1941 20,000

40- 60 “ 1942 21,000

61- 83 “ 1943 23.000

84-107 “ 1944 24.000

108-133 “ 1945 26.000

134-16…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lainhart v. CattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Bannerman v. CattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. State ex rel. Buford v. FearnsideSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  4. Kroegel v. WhyteSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  5. Beville v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Suwannee County v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  2. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1979
  3. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1992
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1982
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API