Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Buford v. Fearnside

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 5, 1924PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

The Attorney General filed in the Circuit Court- an Information in the nature of Qtio Warranto in which it is alleged “that Special Road and Bridge District No. 6 of Putnam County, Florida, was duly created and constituted under the provisions of Chapter 13, Title 9 of,Division 1 of the Revised General Statutes of Florida, by order of the Board of County Commissioners of Putnam County, Florida, duly passed at a regular meeting of said *351Board on May 7, 1923, and said district is still in effect and has never been abolished; that a special election duly held in the territory embraced in said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lainhart v. CattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Stockton v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  3. Butler v. SheriffSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  4. Bannerman v. CattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  5. State ex rel. Lunig v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Amos v. MathewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Martin v. Dade Muck Land Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
  3. Whitney v. Hillsborough CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Jackson Lumber Co. v. Walton CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  5. Williams v. DormanySupreme Court of Florida · 1930

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API