Legal Opinion
Hoyt Crace v. Robert Herzog
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 14, 2015No. 13-35650PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HOYT CRACE, No. 13-35650 Petitioner-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:12-cv-05672-RBL ROBERT HERZOG, Respondent-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted October 7, 2014—Seattle, Washington Filed August 14, 2015 Before: Richard A. Paez, Jay S. Bybee, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Bybee; Dissent by Judge Callahan 2 CRACE V. HERZOG SUMMARY* Habeas Corpus The panel affirmed the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frank Loher v. Todd ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- David Decker v. Rob PerssonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Frank Loher v. Todd ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016