Legal Opinion

David Decker v. Rob Persson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 8, 2016No. 15-35854UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Respondent-appellant appeals the U.S. District Court’s order granting David Decker habeas relief from an Oregon State felony murder conviction with burglary as the predicate felony offense. The District Court granted relief on three claims under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Claim 1(B) addresses defense trial counsel’s failure to request a jury instruction on the lesser included offense of assault. The District Court’s review of this claim is governed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AED-PA”). 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. J. N. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. David Decker v. Rob PerssonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API