Legal Opinion
Dishong v. Peabody Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided December 12, 2003No. CIV.A.4:03 CV 107PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on third-party defendants’ motions for a more definite statement and motions to strike the third-party complaint and to strike the third-party plaintiffs responses to the third-party defendants’ motions for a more definite statement. For the reasons set forth below, the third-party complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Accordingly, third-party defendants’ pending motions are MOOT.
I. Procedural History
Plaintiff Mark P. Dishong, a resident of Virginia, filed a complaint in the above-captioned matter on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bertram v. Freeport McMoran, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. Atlantic Bldg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Noland Company, Incorporated, and Third-Party and Cross-Appellant v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Company, Third-Party and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Duke v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- American Zurich Insurance v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Shaw v. DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL CO.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2009
- Gutierrez-Morales v. PlanckDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2016
- A.W. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- American Zurich v. Cooper Tire & RubberCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.