Legal Opinion

Tschanneral v. District of Columbia Board of Education

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 13, 1984No. 83-2863PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOHN GARRETT PENN, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, a 14 year old child, and his mother who brings the action as the child’s next friend and in her own right, filed this action pursuant to the Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA), as amended, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794, the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and the decision in Mills v. District of Columbia Board of Education, 348 F.Supp. 866 (D.D.C.1972).

I

The plaintiffs allege that the minor plaintiff,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mills v. Board of Education of District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1972
  3. Miller v. SpencerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Vander Malle v. AmbachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Roberson v. District of Columbia Board of Higher EducationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hinson Ex Rel. N.H. v. Merritt Educational CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. Ray v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Block v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
  4. Diamond v. McKenzieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
  5. K.W. v. District. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API