Carolyn LIDGE-MYRTIL, Appellant, v. DEERE & COMPANY, Doing Business as John Deere Company, Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Carolyn Lidge-Myrtil (“Lidge”) appeals from the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Deere & Company (“Deere”) on her race discrimination claims. We agree with the district court that although Lidge fashioned a prima facie case of discrimination, Deere rebutted the presump-tión by offering a legitimate, non-diserimina-tory reason for its failure to promote her. See Lidge-Myrtil v. Deere & Co., 857 F.Supp. 666, 671 (W.D.Mo.1994). Because Lidge is unable to make a showing that Deere’s proffered rationale is pretextual, we affirm.
I
Lidge, a black female,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Paul J. Kiel v. Select Artificials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Phyllis ROSE-MASTON, Appellant, v. NME HOSPITALS, INC., Doing Business as Lutheran Medical Center, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Barber v. C1 Truck Driver Training, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.