Legal Opinion

Gamber v. Missouri Department of Health & Senior Services

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 2007No. WD 67170PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge.

Karen Gamber appeals the directed verdict in favor of the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) on her claims of disability discrimination and constructive discharge. She presents three points on appeal, arguing that the directed verdict was error because “sufficient” material facts were disputed and because her supervisor was an agent of DHSS. All three points are denied, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Facts

In the light most favorable to Karen Gamber, the plaintiff at trial, the facts are as follows. Dunn v. Enter. Rent-A-Car Co.,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wright v. Rolette CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. Pollock v. Wetterau Food Distribution GroupMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Medley v. Valentine Radford Communications, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Cordes v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tina Haskenhoff v. Homeland Energy Solutions, LLCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. Bryce Markham v. Tony WertinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. Gilliland v. Missouri Athletic ClubSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. Wallingsford v. City of MaplewoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. DeWalt v. Davidson Service/Air, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API