Legal Opinion

American Harley Corp. v. Irvin Industries, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1970PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Fuld.

Harley Patents (International) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as British Harley) owned certain patents covering an automobile seat belt buckle. In 1958, it granted American Harley Corp. an exclusive license to manufacture and sell that buckle in the United States and Canada. It had previously granted similar rights to the buckle to a European subsidiary of Irvin Industries, Inc., for England and Europe but not for the United States.

In 1959, owing to its success in Europe, Irvin gave thought to expanding its market to include the United States. It commenced negotiations with…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. T. B. Harms Company v. Edward Eliscu and Ross Jungnickel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Application of State of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. Airco Alloys Division, Airco, Inc. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Sylmark Holdings Ltd. v. Silicone Zone International Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Bailey v. Logan Square Typographers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  5. Mechanical Plastics Corp. v. Rawlplug Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API