United States v. Mirsky
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
THACHER, District Judge.
The fact is admitted by the answer that the respondent, during the period of five years preceding the issue of his certificate of naturalization, deliberately violated the Eighteenth Amendment of the Constitution, and on his plea of guilty was fined for his offense as provided in the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138 % et seq.). The statute requires, as a prerequisite to naturalization, that it shall be made to appear that during the probationary period of five years immediately preceding the application the alien “has behaved as a man of good moral…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. GinsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. WexlerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
- In Re NagyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1924
- In re BonnerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1922
- Ex parte ElsonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Schwab v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- United States v. KuscheDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
- Application of MurraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Marcantonio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.