City of Sioux Falls v. Bohner
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BIEGELMEIER, Judge.
Defendant was charged in municipal court with violating an ordinance of the City of Sioux Falls which prohibits the driving of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, to which charge he entered a plea of not guilty. The proceeding was tried by the judge of the municipal court who found defendant guilty. He appeals from the sentence, part of which was suspended.
Defendant's first claim is that he was unlawfully denied a trial by jury. The court has had occasion to consider the status of violations of city ordinances and the opinions are cited and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Austin v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- State v. HobenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. AmickNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
- Parham v. Municipal Court, City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Brookings v. ThomsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MichalekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Brookings v. RobertsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Brookings v. RobertsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Sioux Falls v. BohnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.