Legal Opinion
State v. Amick
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 1962No. 35164PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
The only question raised by this appeal is whether or not a defendant charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of a city ordinance is entitled to a trial by jury.
The defendant was charged in the municipal court of Omaha with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of a city ordinance. He demanded and was refused a jury trial. He was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and costs. In addition thereto, his driver’s license was • suspended for a period of 6 months. He appealed to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Liberman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. KettererSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Robinson Cadillac Motor Car Co. v. RatekinNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Anderson v. Commissioner of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. ZiembaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. LynchNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
- Philip Landry v. Judge J. Robert Hoepfner and William Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.