Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Engel & Refco, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 14, 2002Published
1Opinion of the Court
*92OPINION OF THE COURT
Eileen Bransten, J.
In the interests of efficiency and judicial economy, the following proceedings are consolidated for purposes of disposition and are addressed in this decision and judgment: Amato v Refco, LLC (Index No. 604195/01), Blumenfeld v Refco, LLC (Index No. 604194/01), Bushnell v Refco, LLC (Index No. 604197/01), Crosby v Refco, LLC (Index No. 604198/01), Dieckhaus v Refco, LLC (Index No. 604191/01), Dominguez v Refco, LLC (Index No. 604188/01), Elliott v Refco, LLC (Index No. 604206/01), Herst Ventures v Refco, LLC (Index No. 604196/ 01), Imhof v Refco, LLC…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- BROWN BROS. v. Beam Constr.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Painewebber Incorporated v. Michael J. Bybyk and Joyce O. BybykCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Willemijn Houdstermaatschappij, Bv v. Standard Microsystems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.