Legal Opinion
Willemijn Houdstermaatschappij, Bv v. Standard Microsystems Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 2, 1997No. 476, Docket 96-7623PublishedCited by 318 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge:
The issue presented on appeal is whether the district court properly vacated an arbitration award. Plaintiff Willemijn Houdstermaatschappij, BV (Willemijn) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Owen, /., vacating Wiilemijn’s arbitration award and denying Willemijn’s petition to confirm the award. The district court found that the arbitrators manifestly disregarded the law. We disagree and accordingly vacate the order of the district court and remand the ease with directions to confirm the award.
BACKGROUND
A The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Andros Compania Maritima, S.A., as Disponent Owners of the Kissavos, and Marc Rich & Co., A.G., as CharterersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Jack BobkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- O.R. Securities, Inc. v. Professional Planning Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by318 opinions
- D.H. Blair & Co. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Blair & Co., Inc. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Duferco International Steel Trading v. T. Klaveness Shipping A/sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Westerbeke Corporation v. Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
313 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.