State v. Mills
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
The State attempts to bring an interlocutory appeal from an evidentiary ruling. During the trial of the appellee, Michael Mills, for rape and carnal abuse Mills sought to introduce evidence that the alleged victim had falsely accused two other men of sex offenses against her. The State objected on the basis of the rape-shield law, Ark. Code Ann. § lb-42-101 (1987), which precludes admitting evidence of “prior sexual conduct” on the part of an alleged rape victim. The Trial Court overruled the objection. The issue is whether this Court has jurisdiction to hear the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Terry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- West v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- State v. MasserySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gaines v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Clark v. Pine Bluff Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Barrows v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Booker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998