State v. King
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRCH, Justice.
We granted permission to appeal under Tenn. R.App. P. 11 to Howard E. King, the appellant, in order to address the constitutionality of Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-201(b)(2) (Supp.1994), 1 which requires trial courts to instruct juries regarding parole and release eligibility when a jury instruction on the sentencing range is requested by either party. Because we find that the statute does not violate the separation of powers doctrine or deprive the appellant of his due process right to a fair trial, we conclude that the statute, as applied under the circumstances of this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- California v. RamosSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Shannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
- Farris v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Gallaher v. ElamTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. SundquistTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. GreenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Bredesen v. Tennessee Judicial Selection CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.