Legal Opinion

Venezuelan Meat Export Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 5, 1923No. B-174PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

The defendant’s demurrer to the petition presents a question of jurisdiction, which it states substantially as follows: Congress by the suits in admiralty act, approved March 9, 1920, 41 Stat. 525, has provided an exclusive remedy in the District Courts of the United States for the presentation of claims arising out of the operation of Government-owned vessels in the merchant service, and, therefore, if the plaintiff has a remedy under the facts stated in the petition the same can not be asserted in the Court of Claims. Other grounds of demurrer are stated.

The petition alleges that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. McElrath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. The Lake MonroeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. United States v. PfitschSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Blamberg Brothers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Venezuelan Meat Export Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1935
  2. Federal Sugar Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Hele v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  4. Markle v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1925
  5. Prince Line, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API