Legal Opinion

Hele v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 7, 1943No. 45473PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

The plaintiff sues for the value of improvements on a tract of land which he leased, under an instrument designated as a license, from the Panama Canal on March 21, 1923. The license was cancelled on November 30, 1939, under a provision thereof, which reads as follows:

The licensee agrees that if at any time it shall become necessary for the United States to occupy the whole or any portion of the land covered by this license, it shall have the right to enter upon and take possession of said land without further compensation to the licensee than the reasonable value of the improvements made by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Ames and Others v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. Johnston. Kansas Pac. Ry Co. v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Johnson v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Matson Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. United States v. PfitschSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Hele v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  3. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API