Vanwinkle v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
A jury found Thomas Otto Vanwinkle guilty of aggravated sexual battery and aggravated battery. He appeals only his conviction for aggravated sexual battery, contesting the sufficiency of the evidence and a jury charge. We affirm.
1. The indictment alleged that Vanwinkle committed aggravated sexual battery by “put [ting] his hand into the vagina of [the victim] and pull[ing] on the inside of her vagina, causing injury, without the consent of said victim.” Vanwinkle contends that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction, arguing that the State failed to prove that he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- State v. BraddySupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Leigh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Hardeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lester v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Millen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Stroud v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- West v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012