Middleton v. Flat River Booming Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal in Chancery from Montcalm Circuit.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
This was a bill in equity by a number of owners o-i mills and factories on Flat river, to enjoin the defendants from various acts which it is alleged tend to render the water-power by which their machinery is operated of little value to them. The bill was demurred to on various, grounds, and was dismissed in the court below.
One objection is that the parties complainant have no. common interest. They are owners of several mills, and only have a common interest in the question involved. The case Is within the decision in Scofield v. Lansing, 17 Mich., 437. No accounting is asked for by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Scofield v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ferry Pass Inspectors' & Shippers' Ass'n v. Whites River Inspectors' & Shippers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Snyder v. CabellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
- Thunder Bay River Booming Co. v. SpeechlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- State ex rel. Wausau Street Railroad v. BancroftWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.