Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Whitehead & Kales Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1934No. Docket No. 88, Calendar No. 37,675PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

On the 28th day of September, 1927, plaintiff,' Monroe Coleman, suffered a compensable injury while employed by Whitehead & Kales Co., defendant, at $27 per week. As a result he has ankylosis of the ring finger of the right hand. The accident was duly reported and on October 13, 1927, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement for compensation by wbicb plaintiff was to receive $10 per week. On January 6,1928, plaintiff signed a settlement receipt showing that he received $252 up to that date. The settlement receipt was never approved by the department. Subsequently plaintiff secured…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Norris v. Elmdale Elevator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Van Driel v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pigue v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Sobotka v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Dunavant v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Lynch v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Lynch v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API