Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lynch v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1950No. Docket 6, Calendar 44,420Published

1DissentSharpe, J.

{dissenting). I am not in accord with the opinion of Mr. Justice Bushnell. The established facts in this case are that plaintiff sustained *174a compensable injury on March 26, 1946, and was paid compensation until September 7, 1946, when he returned to work at favored employment at the same rate of pay he was receiving at the time of the injury. He could have continued at this favored work except for 2 subsequent injuries which are not in any way related to his employment. His present incapacity to work and earn wages was occasioned by injuries received in November, 1946 and May, 1947 and of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hood v. Wyandotte Oil & Fat Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Pigue v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Levanen v. Seneca Copper CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Neal v. Stuart Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Ward v. Heth Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API