Legal Opinion
Axline v. 3M Company
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 10, 2018No. 0:17-cv-00511Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Nancy Axline, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 17-511 (JNE/DTS) ORDER 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc., Defendants. Defendants 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc. (“Defendants”) move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings on all of Plaintiff Nancy Axline’s claims. ECF No. 21. Plaintiff opposes the motion. ECF No. 32. As set forth below, the Court grants Defendants’ motion in part. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a resident of Ohio. She alleges that, on April 21, 2009 in Ohio, she underwent surgery for a left total…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Morgan v. Biro Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Pilgrim v. Universal Health Card, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Clemons v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.