Legal Opinion

Noble v. Manatt

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1919No. Civ. No. 2989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, rendered in an action of forcible entry and detainer.

The premises, the possession of which is involved in the controversy, consist of a certain lot or tract of land and the dwelling-house thereon, of which, in accordance with the allegations of the complaint, the court found plaintiff was on June 18th in the quiet and peaceable possession, and that on said date defendant, with force and violence, entered said premises by breaking open the doors to said dwelling-house and threw plaintiff’s goods, clothing, and provisions into the street,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong & Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lick v. O'DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Swartzbaugh v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Kapner v. MEADOWLARK RANCH ASSN.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Bittman v. CouringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Clement v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API