Russell v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
We conclude that this case should be remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board for a redetermination of the extent of claimant’s permanent partial disability in the light of Russell v. SAIF, 281 Or 353, 574 P2d 653 (1978).
In Romero v. Compensation Department, 250 Or 368, 372-73, 440 P2d 866 (1968), the Supreme Court held:
«* * * Moreover, although we must review the record de novo, we are entitled to take into account the administrative agency’s expertise which develops out of dealing with hundreds of similar cases. As has been pointed out, 'industrial commissions generally become expert in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Surratt v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Ryf v. Hoffman Construction CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Romero v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Russell v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Hart v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clemons v. Roseburg Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Leedy v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Owen v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Edge v. Jeld-WenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Hawkins v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.