Russell v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.
There are two issues in this case. The first is whether a claimant who suffers permanent partial disability but no loss of visual acuity (with maximum correction) as a result of trauma to the eye is entitled to any award of compensation for permanent disability under the Oregon Workers’ Compensation Law. 1 If the first issue is resolved in the claimant’s favor, the second issue is whether the award of compensation for permanent partial disability should be on a "scheduled” or "unscheduled” basis. We hold, with respect to the first issue, that the claimant is entitled to an award of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Kajundzich v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
- Walker v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Webb v. HamiltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Dodier v. State of New Hampshire Department of LaborSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clark v. U. S. PlywoodOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Oregon State Employes Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Woodman v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Russell v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Shubert v. Blue ChipsOregon Supreme Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.