Legal Opinion

Laguna v. Erie Insurance Group

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1988No. 00300PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

This case presents issues arising under the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, hereinafter referred to as MVFRL, 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1701-1798, regarding the availability of first party benefits to the victim of an automobile accident who is both a named insured and an insured under two separate policies. 1 The specific issues for decision are (1) whether' a provision of a policy which precludes recovery of benefits where another insurer at a higher level of priority, as stated in 75 Pa.C.S. § 1713(a) and the policy itself, is liable for coverage is enforceable; and (2)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jeannette Bumberger, Individually and on Behalf of Kevin Bumberger, a Minor v. Insurance Company of North America and Adt Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. Tallman v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Manolakis v. Transamerica InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. McCance v. McCanceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Neilson v. Nationwide Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API