Manolakis v. Transamerica Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HUDOCK, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order granting judgment on the pleadings in favor of Appellee, Transamerica Insurance Company, and against Appellant, a named insured under the Transamerica policy. The trial court concluded that Appellant was seeking to “stack” the benefits under the Transamerica policy with those he obtained under a policy issued by Allstate Insurance Company. Because stacking is prohibited under Section 1717 of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, (“MVFRL”), 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1701 et seq., the trial court entered judgment on the pleadings.
This action was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Laguna v. Erie Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kosor v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Downing v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Neilson v. Nationwide Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Cory v. Stroudsburg Area School Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1991
- Downing v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.