Legal Opinion

Manolakis v. Transamerica Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1991No. 01067PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order granting judgment on the pleadings in favor of Appellee, Transamerica Insurance Company, and against Appellant, a named insured under the Transamerica policy. The trial court concluded that Appellant was seeking to “stack” the benefits under the Transamerica policy with those he obtained under a policy issued by Allstate Insurance Company. Because stacking is prohibited under Section 1717 of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, (“MVFRL”), 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1701 et seq., the trial court entered judgment on the pleadings.

This action was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Laguna v. Erie Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kosor v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Downing v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Neilson v. Nationwide Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Cory v. Stroudsburg Area School Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1991
  5. Downing v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API