Legal Opinion

Brown v. Robertson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1950No. 18,052PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiltrout, J.

Appellant filed his complaint seeking damages. Appellees’ demurrer thereto for want of facts was sustained. Appellant refused to plead further, and judgment was rendered for appellees, that they recover their costs and that appellant take nothing.

Appellees contend that the cause of action attempted to be pleaded is one for a malicious prosecution, while appellant takes the position that it is for the kindred, though less common, action for malicious abuse of process.

If the action is one for malicious prosecution, there is no serious contention that the court committed error in sustaining the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hoppe v. KlapperichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Gabriel v. BorowyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Glidewell v. Murray-Lacy & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  4. Spear v. PendillMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Ellis v. . WellonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen & Ginsburg, P.A.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Farmers Gin Company v. WardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  3. DISPLAY FIXTURES CO., ETC. v. RL Hatcher, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Thompson v. BeechamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Gambocz v. APELNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API