Legal Opinion
Gambocz v. APEL
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 12, 1968PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
102 N.J. Super. 123 (1968)
245 A.2d 507
BILL J. GAMBOCZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
LILLIAN APEL (AND SIX OTHERS), DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 22, 1968.
Decided July 12, 1968.
Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Lee A. Holley argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Holley and Kroner, attorneys).
Mr. Mark D. Larner argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Budd, Larner, Kent & Gross, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.
Plaintiff brought this action against various police personnel and the municipal…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hauser v. BartowNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- McGann v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Wood v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Malone v. BelcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Ash v. CohnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bill J. Gambocz v. Anthony M. YelencsicsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Hoffman v. Asseenontv. Com, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Ruberton v. GabageNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Baglini v. LaulettaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Penwag Property Co., Inc. v. LandauNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.