Legal Opinion

United States v. Brown

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 18, 1958No. 4925PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRich, Judge

This appeal is from the decision of the United States Customs Court, Third Division, C. D. 1852, sustaining the importer’s protest and holding the merchandise involved to he properly classified as beef, fresh, chilled or frozen, dutiable at three cents per pound under paragraph 701 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, rather than as meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, dutiable at 3 cents per pound but not less than 10% ad valorem under paragraph 706 of the Act, also as modified. The competing provisions are:

701…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. United States v. Brown & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  4. United States v. MakaroffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  5. A. Zanmati & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  2. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. American Home Food Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. American Home Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API