Stein v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 37090 (T. D. 35020).
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge
The present merchandise was imported under the tariff act of 1913. It was invoiced as “kartoffelwalzmehl,” which is said by counsel to be a German word meaning “potato ground meal.”
The appraiser reported that the article in question consisted of potato flour obtained by reducing entire potatoes with or without the skin to the state of flour by desiccating and grinding, the process involving the application of sufficient heat to materially modify the ■starch granules. The article was returned for duty as a nonenu-merated manufactured article at 15 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 385,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Vitelli v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. Doragon Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Lehn & Fink Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- United States v. KawaharaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.