Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wistar

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1937No. Appeal, 140PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Barnes,

On the evening of February 7, 1935, the plaintiff, while crossing Germantown Avenue from the east to the west side, at its intersection with Slocum Street and Pelham Road, was struck by a Ford roadster operated by the defendant. Germantown Avenue is a main thoroughfare in the City of Philadelphia, with double trolley tracks thereon. Slocum Street intersects Germantown Avenue on its east side only. Immediately to the south of Slocum Street is Pelham Road, at right angles with Germantown Avenue, on its west side.

The plaintiff alighted from a northbound trolley car…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gilles v. LeasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Eckert v. Merchants Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Newman v. Protective Motor Service Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Dando v. BrobstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Johnson v. FrenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Thompson v. GormanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Grimes v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. DiBona v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Maselli v. StephensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Brooks v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API