Legal Opinion

Buehler v. DeLemos

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.

This suit was commenced by attachment before a justice of the peace for the county of Wayne, and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant St. Louis appealed to the circuit court. The bond on appeal recited that “we, Demas St. Louis, as principal, and John H. Ley and Fred Holcomb, as sureties, * * * are held,” etc., and was in the' ordinary form, containing the condition required by statute, and was signed by Demas St. Louis and John H. Ley, but not by Fred Holcomb. John H. Ley appeared before the justice, and justified as to his responsibility under oath by affidavit subscribed by…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Emerson v. Detroit Steel & Spring Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Davidson v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API