Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Fox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Trover by Alexander Davidson against David W. Fox, the Detroit Journal Company, Fred H. Lutz, and William W. Watson. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action of trover to recover the value of certain store fixtures and bicycle sundries taken on two attachments in favor of the Detroit Journal Company and Fred H. Lutz, respectively, against the property of the Davidson Cycle Company, a foreign corporation. Plaintiff is the assignee of the Davidson Cycle Company. Defendant Fox is the constable who served, the writs. Defendant Watson is a warehouseman with whom the property was stored. The circuit judge held that the attachment proceedings were valid, and directed a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiff contends that the law…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nicolls v. LawrenceMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Matthews v. ForslundMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Buehler v. DeLemosMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Showen v. J. L. Owens Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Grand Haven Military Club v. MulhollandMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Lutz v. Davidson Cycle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API