In re Franklin Savings & Loan Co.

DARR, District Judge.

This cause is before the court to review an order of the referee denying petitioner’s claim for prior payment of $555.

The facts of the controversy are as -stipulated, and these facts and the claim of the: *663petitioner are clearly stated in her petition to review, which are as follows:

“(1) The bankrupt had, in its possession, certain stock certificates, assigned in blank, belonging to petitioner under a written contract to hold them, ‘for safe keeping’, until they could be sold at specified prices'. They were never sold but, without petitioner’s knowledge or consent, the…