Legal Opinion

Gilliam v. McCormack

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1887PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. A. C. Merritt, Oh.

1Opinion of the CourtBurton, J.

The report of the Commission of Referees contains a full statement of the facts. The reasoning, as well as the conclusions, of Judge Caldwell, who prepared that report, being altogether satisfactory, is adopted and made a part of this opinion. It is as follows:

“These bills were brought to compel an application of the equitable doctrine of marshaling securities.
“The defendant, M. McCormack, owned three lots of ground — A, B, and C — -in the city of Nashville, which he mortgaged to various creditors, as follows:
“First — A, B, and' C, to McEarland, May 81st, 1877, to secure $1,000.
“Second — A…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leib v. StriblingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Whirlpool Corp. v. Plad, Inc. (In Re Plad, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1982
  2. Carter v. Tanners Leather Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Colvin v. Petree (In Re Dan Hixson Chevrolet Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1982
  4. Willis v. Mann Const. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Newby v. FoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API