Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

King County v. Stringer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1924No. 18049PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

King county commenced this action to recover from the defendant Stringer, formerly sheriff, and the National Surety Company, surety on his official bond, for moneys alleged to be the property of the county, received by Stringer by virtue of his office and not accounted for or paid over to the county, together with interest.

The complaint alleges in substance that Stringer was the duly elected and qualified sheriff of King county for the term 1919-1920; that the surety company was surety on his official bond in the sum of $5,000; that, by virtue of Stringer’s office as sheriff, he received from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holzman v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Mulcrevy, & Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. MulcrevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Franklin County v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Skagit County v. American Bonding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Scofield v. EasterdayWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Holland, Jailer v. Fayette CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Raynor v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API