Legal Opinion

Burlingame v. Hardin County

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 20, 1917PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Ewdin District Court. — R. M. Wrigiit, Judge. .The opinion sufficiently states the case. —

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

i. payments: recovery of payments: voiunfary payments: agreement for return. The facts material to the disposition of this case are undisputed. The plaintiff was the duly elected, qualir an(j acting clerk of the district court « of Hardin County for two or more terms. *921During the period of such service, acting under the order or appointment of the district court, he at different times performed the duties of referee for examination of reports made to said court by executors, administrators and guardians, for which services he was allowed compensation in the form of fees taxed and allowed as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Erwin v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1889
  2. Finley v. Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. KeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. FlynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. DickeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Mulcrevy, & Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Moore v. Sheppard, Comp.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Jurgens v. Davenport, Rock Island & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  3. Hammon v. GilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Pure Oil Co. v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
  5. State v. HinshawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API