Redman (William) v. State

extraneous to this statute; (4) the district court erred in giving a Byford instruction and in refusing to give a Sanborn instruction based on the State's failure to preserve a cell phone belonging to the victim; (5) the district court erred in considering instructions stating that voluntary intoxication cannot be the sole cause of a "disease or defect of the mind" for the purposes of an insanity defense; (6) the district court abused its discretion in allowing one of the State's experts to testify; and (7) cumulative error warrants reversal. The parties are familiar with the facts of this…