Legal Opinion

Cortinas v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2008No. 47905PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Parraguirre, J.:

The primary issue we address in this appeal is whether harmless-error review applies when a general verdict based on multiple theories of liability may rest on a legally invalid alternative theory. To resolve this issue, we must address relevant federal cases and reconcile two prior decisions by this court.

The United States Supreme Court first addressed the impact of a general verdict that may rest on a legally valid or a legally invalid alternative theory of liability in Stromberg v. California, in which the Court held that a general verdict delivered…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Higgs v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Brass v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Clancy v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Truesdell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API