Legal Opinion

Grey v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2008No. 46146PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Douglas, J.:

In this appeal, we consider whether parties in criminal cases are required to give notice of expert rebuttal witnesses. We also consider whether the State’s failure to formally file an allegation of habitual criminality precludes the district court from imposing an enhanced sentence under NRS 207.010.

Although we promulgate a new rule of criminal procedure requiring parties in criminal cases to give notice of expert rebuttal witnesses, we hold that the State’s failure to provide such notice in this case does not require reversal. We further conclude that the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. McNair v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Crawford v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Green v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Valdez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Mitchell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Matylinsky v. BudgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Mendoza-Lobos v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Somee v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API