Legal Opinion

MacLean v. Naumkeag Trust Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 10, 1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

In the Superior Court the defendant’s demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff appealed. His declaration is in three counts. In his brief the plaintiff states that the first count is for malicious prosecution; the second "for false imprisonment, although in form sufficient to sustain an action for malicious prosecution.” The third count is for the abuse of process.

The first count alleges that the defendant maliciously and without probable cause procured the plaintiff to be indicted for the larceny of flour to the value of $5,000 of the property of the Naumkeag Trust Company; that without the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  2. Coupal v. WardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Everett v. HendersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Zinkfein v. W. T. Grant Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Shea v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jones v. Brockton Public Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Mezullo v. MaletzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  3. Gabriel v. BorowyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Wynne v. RosenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Stromberg v. CostelloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API