Legal Opinion

Shea v. Sullivan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 22, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

These are actions of tort to recover for the alleged false arrest and imprisonment of the plaintiffs. The cases were tried together. At the close of the evidence against the defendant railroad company, a verdict was directed in its favor subject to the exception of the plaintiffs. At the close of the entire evidence, the cases against the other defendants were submitted to the jury, who returned verdicts for those defendants. All the material evidence is set forth in the bill of exceptions.

*258There was evidence tending to show the following facts: On September 2, 1923, the plaintiffs boarded a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keefe v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Wax v. McGrathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Joyce v. ParkhurstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Zinkfein v. W. T. Grant Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Bates v. ReynoldsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McDermott v. W. T. Grant Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Ziemba v. FO'CS'LE, INC.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. MacLean v. Naumkeag Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Matthews v. Southern Ry. SystemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  5. Kredit v. RyanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API