Legal Opinion
Rothschild v. Cree, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 13, 2010No. Civil Action 10-10133-WGYPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In the present case, the plaintiff Gertrude Neumark Rothschild charges the defendant Cree, Inc. with infringement of her U.S. Patents Nos. 4,904,618 (the “'618 Patent”) and 5,252,499 (the “'499 patent”). This memorandum and order addresses various motions brought by the parties, including a motion to dismiss for lack of standing, motions for claim construction, and motions for summary judgment.
II. BACKGROUND
A. Facts
1. The Patents-in-Suit
Rothschild owns two patents on methods of producing light emitting diodes (“LEDs”), which are at…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Synthes, Inc. v. Emerge Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Nationwide Book Industries, LLC v. A & S Booksellers, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Olaf Soot Design, LLC v. Daktronics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Altair Eyewear, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Banco Do Brasil, S.A. v. 275 Washington Street Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.